<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leave No Trace &#187; aesthetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notrace.org.uk/tag/aesthetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notrace.org.uk</link>
	<description>Erasing with digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Digital theory and philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.notrace.org.uk/2009/11/digital-theory-and-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notrace.org.uk/2009/11/digital-theory-and-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aesthetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notrace.org.uk/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(the teeming void) has just published an interesting essay that touches on the philosophical implications of the nature of digital media, with reference to the work of HC Gilje. I like Blink, with its connotations of distorted squash court markings and glowing reflections on polished wood surfaces, but I&#8217;m not convinced by the rest of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(the teeming void) has just published an interesting <a href="http://teemingvoid.blogspot.com/2009/10/right-here-right-now-hc-giljes-networks.html">essay</a> that touches on the philosophical implications of the nature of digital media, with reference to the work of HC Gilje. I like Blink, with its connotations of distorted squash court markings and glowing reflections on polished wood surfaces, but I&#8217;m not convinced by the rest of the work discussed. Nevertheless, the analysis of the aesthetics of digital media is interesting:</p>
<blockquote><p>The aesthetics of digital media flow from a related generality, where sound and image are encoded as fields of data. If a pixel is a number, an image is a grid of pixels, video a stream of images, and each of these numbers can take any value at all, then formally, an aesthetics of digital video is only a matter of finding the right values &#8211; fishing around in a space containing <em>all possible</em> digital video. If digital media creates this generalised space, <em>anything at all</em>, the media arts are faced with unavoidable questions: not only what to make &#8211; which values to choose, but how to choose them, and why?</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a subject that appears to fascinate the author of (the teeming void) because he&#8217;s touched on it <a href="http://teemingvoid.blogspot.com/2009/01/transduction-transmateriality-and.html">several</a> <a href="http://teemingvoid.blogspot.com/2008/03/notes-on-transmateriality.html">times</a> before. I particularly like the phrase: “…the digital is just the analog operating within certain tolerances or threshholds.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notrace.org.uk/2009/11/digital-theory-and-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
